Kevin Boudreau, Northeastern & NBER 

Welcome to my research page. Here is my c.v.

I study how platforms of various kinds can be better designed for growth and innovative performance. I am an associate professor at Northeastern and a Research Associate at NBER. At Northeastern, I am affiliated with the D'Amore Mckim School of Business, the College of Computer and Information Science, the College of Social Science and Humanities, and the College of Engineering's IoT Research Cluster. My primary external service responsibilities relate to serving as Associate Editor at Management Science in both the Innovation & Entrepreneurship department and the Strategy department, and serving on the editorial board at the Strategic Management Journal.


  • Jan 26 2018 University of Michigan
  • Feb 27 NBER Productivity Lunch
  • March 23 2018 Economics of Online Platforms Conference, University of Florida Law & Economics Departments
  • May 3 2018 Harvard Business School - IP and Digitization Workshop
  • May 17 2018 Northwestern University Kellog School of Management, Searle Center Research Roundtable on Standard Setting Organizations and Patents.
  • May 30 2018 Stanford University
  • August 2018 Academy of Management - Chairing Junior Faculty Consortium BPS + Field Experimental Methods + Entrepreneurship & Digitization
  • August 2018  Northwestern University Kellog School of Management, Organization Design Community Annual Conference, Ecosystem Design and Boundaries of the Firm speaker 


  • Field Experiment on Multi-Disciplinary Innovators
  • Field Experiment on Platform Adoption Dynamics
  • Field Experiment on Engineering Training
  • Field Experiment on Gender and STEM


  • NEW Boudreau, K. (2018) "Amateurs". Working Paper.
I exploit a quasi-experiment in data on the Apple AppStore to show that an interplay between low development costs and developers' non-pecuniary payoffs causes the “bottom to fall out” of the market to large numbers of amateurs. Amateurs exhibit different behavior than that predicted by standard theory and invest more in innovation than would otherwise be predicted.

Whereas patent and copyright use historically have differed across industries while tending to be similar across suppliers within the same industry, the “mash-up” nature of digital products (amalgams of programs, datasets, graphics, algorithms, etc.) results in unusually finer-grained differences within industries. Pliant digital product development choices and IP choices go hand-in-hand.

Rather than organize as traditional firms, many of today's companies organize as platforms that sit at the nexus of multiple exchange and production relationships. This paper considers a most basic question of organization in platform contexts: the choice of boundaries. 

Today's crowdfunding raises funds for tiny, private entrepreneurial ventures without granting funders private claims to a project's future value. Rather than “investments,” these are “contributions.” This paper argues that for such crowdfunding neither producer nor consumer surplus – i.e., project quality, in traditional terms – will play a direct role in determining funding.

In contrast to traditional models of winner-take-all outcomes in digital markets, many of today's digital innovators face intensive competition – even where prevailing price is zero. This paper investigates how network effects and “freemium” strategies, typical of winner-take-all contexts, work in such competitive conditions. 

    • Lakhani, K., K. Boudreau, C. Baldwin, A. MacCormack, E. Guinan, et al. (2013) "Prize-based contests can provide solutions to computational biology problems." Nature Biotechnology31(2):108. 


    • Guinan, E., K. Boudreau, K. Lakhani.  (2013) "Experiments in Open Innovation at the Harvard Medical School." MIT Sloan Management Review54(3): 45-52.

    K B,
    Oct 4, 2017, 5:11 AM
    K B,
    Jan 25, 2018, 5:07 AM
    K B,
    Oct 30, 2017, 5:39 AM